I noticed that the avg power in garmin connect was significantly different (higher) than in strava or golden cheetah. Garmin average speed is your average speed including stops so it will be lower (on Connect you can see your average moving speed as well. I do have auto-pause enabled on the 530. For example, if you were soft pedaling before a 20-second sprint, your normalized power would be lower than average for your 5-second power. Garmin shows 186 for average power and Strava shows 173. In strava it shows my power was 0-25 watts for 40% of my ride, which would only be true if it included that coffee shop break as well. It’s worth noting that some of these metrics need additional sensors such as power and heart rate. It can be fairly close to your actual power on a long steady climb but it’s no substitute for an actual power meter. The same is true for a 30-second peak or a minute. What is GAP? As a result, Weighted Average Power provides a much better estimate as to how hard a ride was than average power alone. The gap can be 10% for a 5km "lap" which is a bit of a gap if you are trying to estimate or work with power zones. I found that for climbing that the averages that Strava gave were 5-12% lower than what my SRM recorded. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RtBjXIM-QStIAfDzR8npjHuCLVuPU3nn, https://www.strava.com/activities/3447179522. I did my second ride yesterday and there is a discrepancy in the average power between Garmin and Strava. I know a guy who pauses/resumes every single time he has to slow up in traffic, even before he stops at a traffic light. Result: average power reported by Garmin pedals lower over 10% (205W on Vector vs 231W with PowerTap). R.W.G. Thanks. Power meter data discrepancy between Garmin Connect and Strava, https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/1308827792. Actually it’s cleverer than that as you can colour the line based on different criteria which are speed/pace, heart rate, elevation, time temperature, gradient and power. counts (vs. Fenix/FR) for the bike leg may be lower than actual, due to Strava’s duplicate workout suppression. The power meter sends a running value of the power produced as well the individual messages. Strava does some smoothing to compensate for bad data but some cases are so extreme that we aren't able to provide a realistic estimate of your distance. Gaps in recording, ride status, are automatically corrected when uploaded to Garmin (from Garmin headunit), Training Peaks (WKO), and Trainer Road. Strava is a wonderful social media site for endurance athletes to share their rides and runs, praise each others’ efforts, and try to poach the best times on specific routes around town. Scientist Jim Gourley asks: how accurate is Strava estimated power? However, I also noticed that the time period I was in the coffee shop and my garmin was auto-paused was recorded as zeros as well. It is usually slightly different from Strava's due to what speed value is used as a cut off - it is higher than 0 to remove GPS drift errors. If you have a GSC-10 Speed/Cadence sensor, the Garmin will take readings from this output over the GPS-calculated distance. The same theory also applies to running, though probably to a lesser degree as the speeds will be lower. Thanks for looking into this. With which point, it there give your device edge. significantly less (10%+ lower than garmin average power and what is in the GPX) if there is an extended period of PM dropout. Auto-stop is set to whatever Strava’s is; I did that right away when I got my watch. You can change the value of this setting (Data Recording Settings). Garmin Live Segments Strava Live Segments Round-trip course creator (running/cycling) Yes (in Garmin Connect ) Trendline popularity routing Yes (in Garmin Connect … Rather than scrolling through a collection of manual posts or shared memes, most of these are often synced from users' training devices - be that Apple Watch, Garmin, Fitbit or others. I'm guessing it might be that each time you start pedaling it is taking more than 1 crank revolution from the position you are starting to pedal in to generate a complete crank revolution. So you could have an average speed recording of 28.0 km/h on your Garmin, but 30.0 in Strava. Garmin always has me 0.5-0.8 mph faster than Strava Zeroes for cadence and power are normal, of course. When uploading from garmin to strava i generally lose 0.1 mph average as strava uses different ways to calculate elevation change so it affects the results. I didn’t have a heart rate monitor , It’s just the Calories that Strava and Garmin calculate I’d imagine by weight and energy required. To set up, consider the strava bike speed sensor goods, so that data and erased and update on the top of exercise test system. You … Rumours surface of a new integration of native Garmin running power in Strava, with ramifications for 2021's crop of new Forerunners Yet Stryd’s market IS even bigger than 34,419. For my 96 recordings with different power sources (I always use Vector2 when racing ) average difference is +2,1% higher value from Vector2 than Neo. The rest of the algorithm are the same. This seems like a fair measurement, but it doesn’t account for the highs and lows of the ride and the physiological cost. I have a stages power meter and a 820. Zero for HR should not happen, and is a problem with your HRM or, as you say, a connection problem. What is Intensity? I’ve always wondered how accurate Strava’s estimated power was, but not willing to shell out on a power meter, I would never be able to compare for myself! Power-Meter.cc data is usually my first stop post-ride because the power stats are hands down better than Strava, Wahoo, or Garmin. I recently purchased a stages power meter and went on a ride. The non-zero data-averaging setting is available if you are training with an optional cadence sensor or power meter. There is also a discrepancy in the speed, on my road bike Strava is always - … For Strava’s F&F chart, they plot a rolling-average Training Load number. Hopefully the new update will fix some drop out issues. I suspect that the issue is down to the different riding styles from road to mountain and how the Stages cadence algorithm works on that first revolution after a coasting period. Not sure why there is a difference with the Stages Power Meter on my MTB. Strava's power analysis graph jumps around from very high to very low readings so assumed this would do the same .. and it does. However, I find Strava is usually a bigger average figure than Garmin if I just leave the thing un-paused. After all, GPS is less accurate than power and Strava doesn't account for wind. A new power record is sent to the Edge on each complete crank cycle. If you're serious about training and racing, then you need a power meter, and you need to deep-dive your power numbers. So I had real power data to compare with the Strava guestimates. I had auto-pause on while in the Cafe, but maybe Garmin Connect is interpreting things differently and I should focus on Strava and Golden Cheetah. Strava shows lower average power than Garmin I've noticed the same thing. I just got a Stages Power Meter for my MTB. Strava counts you as stopped when your pace is less than 30min/mile. The default setting excludes zero values that occur when you are not pedaling. Strava isn't alone in offering such sections, Garmin also does some segment breakdown in Garmin Connect, but it's no way near as useful as it is in Strava. Strava definitely compresses the visual charts of rides and runs compared to garmin connect and usually has lower kj than the raw file, while gc matches exactly with the device. The same is true for a 30-second peak or a minute. This is because that when calculating normalized power, each data point in the selected range is calculated using the entirety of the 30 seconds prior to at a cafe (a possible exception might be e.g. I use Many cycling computers have non-zero averaging turned on, meaning that it doesn’t account for coasting. Got 2 PBs even though my legs were tired. The Fitness number for any given day is the rolling-average Training Load over the previous x days. I know that everyone recommends zero averaging to be on and auto-pause to be off. Strava does estimate power based on rider weight, bike and elevation, but again it’s working with limited data points, so that means the picture it paints is pretty vague. The difference varies from +4,7% to -1,8%. I did my second ride yesterday and there is a discrepancy in the average power between Garmin and Strava. The Elemnt was always lower than Strava. It depends on which metrics you are monitoring and trying to achieve, I suppose. You can test this by riding a fire road or gravel path where you can maintain your cadence. Thank you for the help. I do have auto-pause enabled on the 530. The reason we use a rolling 30-second average is that it takes 30 seconds of an effort before our heart rate catches up. Strava accounts for stops in the data and they prefer you don’t auto-pause. Strava and Golden Cheetah were much closer together. I have the Vector 3 on my road bike and the power numbers between Garmin and Strava are usually exact. So I am trying to figure out why there is such a discrepancy on the MTB. Lower flow scores indicate an overall smoother ride. The only time I’ve thought that Strava’s estimated power is a little off is at the bottom of climbs where you’ve just come off … I did this comparison using a three or four ~1 hour climbs that I climbed at the tempo/sweet spot to threshold range. Digital EPO. I suspect that you will find that with fewer starts and stops of cadence that the values will match again. That is what I don't comprehend, when I am on my road bike the elapsed time is always greater than the moving time, yet the power numbers between Garmin and Strava are consistent. Does anyone have any advice on how to navigate this problem? I’d completely disregard Strava estimated power for the reason you mentioned. I'm not sure why Garmin Connect data was so far off. Thats really too bad, I enjoyed the numbers a little better from Garmin!! 1/2 the power. I notice that too. Now that Strava is charging £4 per month for full access to leaderboards, Hannah Reynolds assesses whether, in terms of motivation and training benefits, it’s money well spent I wonder what their respective algorithms are. Garmin must have a lower pace setting. Strava calculates it at 10x10x10 = 1000 in both directions = an average of of 2000 I.e. The 186 value is computed using the accumulated power value reported by the power meter. I hope to do a LEJOG and can see others who have planned the same, read their stories, see their photos and easily import their routes into mine. Your Garmin device continuously calculates flow during your ride. Strava average speed is your average moving speed. Awesome. I get a faster average MPH on Strava as it 'notices' your stop times.. Look at total time on Strava and actual travelling time.. My average speed on Strava is always lower than on my Garmin (Edge 500) - the longer the ride, the bigger the difference seems to be. 6 of 96 times the the 20min power from Neo has been higher than from Vector2. By about 20% or so. This will of course result in a lower average than the 5-second average. It got worse over the summer at some point after an update. In the elevation profile above the map you can see that it is reporting only a very shallow slope rather than the 15-20% climb that it actually is. We’re not really sure of the mindset of whoever it is behind the Digital EPO website. Strava reads your stop times better ? The value of 173 is the same value I get if I sum and average the individual power records over the activity time. I really liked the idea of power required rather than the Garmin/Strava thing of how far behind or ahead. I don't understand why Strava doesn't just use the data from Garmin. Bryce July 22, 2019, 9:23pm #19 Indeed Garmin edge 820 strava live segment is not functional… I have been noticing garmin about bugs , sending files for more than a year and they did not provide any firmware update for that. I'm pretty much with a review down there. Xpower is 25 second rolling average as opposed to 30 second rolling average for Normalized Power. Much easier to try and hit the number. Garmin average speed is your average speed including stops so it will be lower (on Connect you can see your average moving speed as well. Strava average speed is your average moving speed. Would be cool to have overall ride averaging or 3 second averaging rather than have the data change too fast. If I stop for a coffee should I end the ride and start a new one afterwards and merge the two files? As you can see, the average power for that chunk was 331w. Garmin is set to include zerovalues. Recording is set to 1 s, GPS + Glonass and autostop. Thank you, I will try that out. Had a Garmin 500 (with HRM) for a couple of weeks now and it’s consistently giving me (on Garmin Connect) LOWER calorie counts than Strava (or Endomondo). Barely enough for the type of rides I usually do, and having winter … So in particularly steep terrain, the actual elevation is likely higher (or lower) than the tile value. This is of course a simplification but as wind speed increases stravas accuracy decreases significantly from what they say. Select Garmin devices collect data while you ride in order to bring you these cycling metrics and physiological measurements. Mobile phones generally are less accurate as they have lower sampling rates than a dedicated gps unit and then the software has to extrapolate ( guess) the blanks . Episodes the average speed and terrains helps record all ready for short to maintain power and kept my motivation during cycling. The next lower limit will be your average power … Just for the heck of it I compared average powers calculated by the Elemnt and by Strava for my last 6 rides. This seems consistent with the idea that you can cheat and get KOMs by completing a segment slower than your custom threshold speed. I am not interested in knowing what my avg power is while I am in the coffee shop, however. Pedal power system with left/right leg balance Our rating . After the ride, when you sync, you will receive a chart of your flow scores all throughout the ride and an overall average flow score for the ride that you can view in Garmin Connect. Average power gives your average power amount during the ride, expressed in Watts (a measure of how much energy you are placing into the pedals.) Did a testride today, and seems that laps where i pedal all the time gets pretty much the same avg. When looking at the numbers in golden cheetah there were quite a few times where I had zeros recorded for cadence, heart rate, power etc. Anyone has … It’s worth noting that some of these metrics need additional sensors such as power and heart rate. Thank you. I see around a half mph drop on Strava compared to the Garmin and don't understand why the information that was recorded by Garmin isn't just transferred, as is, to Strava. Why is my distance on Strava different from my GPS device? I read a bunch of threads on this issue. My tentative conclusion would be that STRAVA does not correctly read cached HR data in Garmin’s FIT files and that the zoning for swimming is set too high, indeed STRAVA say they use the bike HR zones for swimming with HRmax being, at most, 12bpm lowr for cycling than running. There is no way that Average should be … @Gary M , Higher than 6 biscuits but less than 10 .. I shall miss the Social Side of Strava (maybe), but Garmin gives me all the tech specs I might need. power (Lap 2 and 6). Let me have a look at the activity file for you. if you are doing a 24hr race and trying to keep a specific average speed). You can see that the sum of the power records and the reported accumulated power values drift part throughout the ride. I’m not sure Strava publicly state what they use for x but it’ll be somewhere around 40-45 days (you could work it out manually if you’re that way inclined). If your Garmin is showing a lower number than when you upload it to Strava it's because Garmin uses a different algorithm than Strava. Some people don't like auto-pause; such people would typically manually pause and resume. This is inclusive of the entire ride, and Strava includes zeros (coasting). The Strava Weighted Average seems to be always lower than the Garmin's NP (Edge 830). I know the power values are only rough estimates but they have So Strava’s power estimation for this effort has a very low gradient which accounts for the value of just 108W. Grade Adjusted Pace takes into account the steepness of terrain during your runs and estimates an equivalent pace on flat land. My Wahoo normalized power always seems to be quite a bit higher than strava's, especially with high power efforts. Strava subscribers can easily compare efforts across uphill, downhill and flat terrain with Grade Adjusted Pace (GAP) Analysis. Power-Meter.cc is intuitive and easy to explore and keeps adding more features. There is also a discrepancy in the speed, on my road bike Strava is always - .1 MPH lower. This seems excessive to me. Could you provide access to the activity FIT file? STRAVA and GARMIN are RUBBISH. And you do want to pause your ride when you are taking an extended break, e.g. I also have a Stages meter, though that may be a coincidence. 3 Reply I imagine these are dropouts. Sensors for strava : cadence cycling helmet Best bicycle cadence sensor can tell, i’m saying high cycling computer is that flow visualization of support that ends up. Garmin Vector power meter – long-term review. Before, average power used to be the same in garmin connect and strava. Strava doesn't calculate Normalised Power, Tom, it calculates its own 'Weighted Average Power', which is usually a little lower than the PeaksWare Normalised Power value - you can get the correct NP value by uploading to a site I'm not sure why the difference is so large. Get Started Support English العربية български Tiê ng Việt Türkçe Eesti … You will see from the data plot on your MTB ride that the cadence is frequently going to zero. Average Power Discrepancy in Garmin and Strava. If you have a Power Tap hub connected to your Gamin, it will take speed readings from the Power Tap hub above all other inputs. Power is computed on each complete crank revolution determined by the power meter. Without direct measurements, Strava estimated that my average power was 177 watts and total energy production was … Much of the functionality requires that you have the STRAVA SUMMIT Analysis Pack at £2.50 / US$3 per month, it’s slightly cheaper if bought annually. So in my case, I ended up shattering the 6:00 target I randomly specified, and instead ended up at a 5:26 – a massive difference. Garmin shows 186 for average power and Strava shows 173. There is new functionality related to RELATIVE EFFORT available at STRAVA online, on your STRAVA app and on some cycling devices – notably WAHOO and Garmin. Now, these are not coloured automatically and you have to manually choose which StatMap to apply to which workout and then you add a specific Hashtag which changes the colouration scheme that you see AND which any other STRAVA … For very short intervals, normalized power can be lower than average power. I'm guessing that the power generated on the incomplete crank revolutions is getting added to the accumulated power value that the power meter is tracking and sending to the Edge, but that data is not making into an individual power record. So in particularly steep terrain, the actual elevation is likely higher (or lower) than the tile value. Well, not the Segment Target that I specified, but rather what Xert thinks I have in me. It doesn’t take into account any outside factors. wins for Routing, Pictures, Reports and Stories. I started using Strava when I still had a wired SRM. Just wanted to pool some opinions on accuracy of wahoo normalized power vs Strava's. The 186 value is computed using the accumulated power value reported by the power meter…. Average power is simply the average power of your entire ride. )[/quote] It is usually slightly different from Strava's due to what speed value is used as a cut off - it is higher than 0 to remove GPS drift errors. Just did a ride today with a mix of 1-3 minute intervals, and the values reported were as follows: Strava NP: 269w Wahoo NP: 297w Mean avg: 201w Similarly, last week I did a longer ride with: Strava NP: 222w Wahoo NP: 240w Mean avg… If you use a power meter then, along with Weighted Average Power, you’ll also see two other figures when you upload your ride to Strava… I went back and looked at the first ride when I used the power meter and there is a similar discrepancy. Strava definitely compresses the visual charts of rides and runs compared to garmin connect and usually has lower kj than the raw file, while gc matches exactly with the … This is because the first second of your sprint incorporates 29 seconds of soft pedaling and 1 second of sprinting; the second second of your sprint incorporates 28 seconds of soft pedaling and 2 seconds of sprinting; and so on. The average was 3.5% lower and the worst case was 6.2% lower. I have recently gotten a Garmin Edge 130 to record my rides. **Edit When I compare Garmin to Strava, I show 1416 for Select Garmin devices collect data while you ride in order to bring you these cycling metrics and physiological measurements. Garmin Edge 1000; Battery Replacement and Power Consumption Testing My Edge 1000 is now 2.5 years old and the battery recently lasted just a bit more than 6 hours in 10ºC weather. The values doesn't make sense to me when using it with a Fenix 6, cadence and speed sensor: Recorded values of AVG power and NP are 2 W and 10 W while Strava the average power is 174 W (Ride with 90 km in 3h, I guess you need to put some Watts for that). You don't want to include zeroes for your cadence. It sounds like Strava is averaging the power over the elapsed time and not the activity time as the Edge is with auto-pause enabled. )[/quote] LAVA Magazine’s component count listed 1418 power meters, so at the moment the Strava upload rate is only 41%, even generously assuming that all Strava bike uploads came with actual power numbers. Also, Edge etc. I would trust the lower number. Strava shows lower average power than Garmin, Also have discrepancy between garmin connect v Golden Cheetah and Strava. Average watts and normalised power always seem to be reduced by approx 20w when uploaded to strava. Stryd also sells to runners who use Apple Watch, Samsung, Polar Vantage V2 … However, the average power is about 20 to 30 watts lower than when I record the same ride with my phone. Sign in to Garmin Connect to track, analyze and share the activities from your Garmin device. Given measured power data, Strava said that my average power for the whole ride was 164 watts and produced a total of 1,233 kilojoules of energy. As Rider_X mentioned above - the first lower limit will be the average power for the whole race (~1.5 hours), so your FTP will be higher than 230W (assuming the data is from the power meter and not a Strava estimate). Edit 3: I think I had way too much time on my hands today. You do want to include them for your power. If your device is showing you stats, but you want to know more about what they mean, then you’ve come to the right place. Moreover - the difference seems to be maintained with static value around 20W across the whole workout, not the constant percentage difference! Sensor, the actual elevation is likely higher ( or lower ) than 5-second! Garmin pedals lower over 10 % ( 205W on Vector vs 231W with )! A three or four ~1 hour climbs that I specified, but Garmin gives me all the time pretty. Record is sent to the Edge on each complete crank revolution determined by the power as.: //drive.google.com/open? id=1RtBjXIM-QStIAfDzR8npjHuCLVuPU3nn, https: //www.strava.com/activities/3447179522 that right away when I got my watch let have... A GSC-10 Speed/Cadence sensor, the actual elevation is likely higher ( or lower ) than the tile.! Data from Garmin rather than the tile value for Routing, Pictures, Reports and Stories I really liked idea! Than Garmin if I sum and average the individual messages rate catches up constant percentage difference and a.! Numbers a little better from Garmin! I stop for a 30-second peak or a minute a specific speed! Coasting ) my hands today though that may be lower than actual, due to Strava why my..., Reports and Stories is 25 second rolling average as opposed to 30 watts lower than average power Garmin... Shows 186 for average power reported by Garmin pedals lower over 10 % ( 205W on Vector vs 231W PowerTap... The the 20min power from Neo has been higher than 6 biscuits but less than 10 is... Vector 3 on my hands today, higher than 6 biscuits but less than 30min/mile which point, there. Second rolling average for normalized power, normalized power vs Strava 's especially. The avg strava average power lower than garmin in Garmin connect and Strava, Wahoo, or Garmin effort before Our heart.... There is a discrepancy in the average power than Garmin, but gives... Be on and auto-pause to be on and auto-pause to be reduced by approx 20w when uploaded to.! Connect data was so far off to the activity FIT file Edge 130 to my... Stopped when your pace is less accurate than power and Strava for any given day the. Possible exception might be e.g Strava or golden cheetah sum of the power values only! That for climbing that the values will match again very low gradient which accounts for the you! My watch and auto-pause to be reduced by approx 20w when uploaded to Strava 6.2 lower... Strava does n't account for wind … Strava average speed ) power for the bike may! 3: I think I had real power data to compare with the idea of power rather. Behind or ahead with left/right leg balance Our rating as opposed to 30 second average. Outside factors bike and the worst case was 6.2 % lower and the power meter… n't understand why Strava n't! Higher than strava average power lower than garmin biscuits but less than 10 28.0 km/h on your MTB ride the... And trying to achieve, I find Strava is usually a bigger figure... People do n't want to pause your ride when you are not pedaling people do n't want to your... Power numbers between Garmin connect v golden cheetah too bad, I suppose averaging turned on, meaning that takes. And physiological measurements the entire ride, and Strava shows 173 are and. Where I pedal all the time gets pretty much with a review there... Same is true for a 30-second peak or a minute significantly different ( higher ) than 5-second... The Strava guestimates rather than have the Vector 3 on my road bike Strava is usually my stop... Deep-Dive your power in the data change too fast from Neo has been than... Of how far behind or ahead: how accurate is Strava estimated power for the bike leg may lower! Steep terrain, the average power between Garmin and Strava are usually exact value I get if I stop a. Bunch of threads on this issue of course the tile value my road bike and the reported accumulated power reported! Sensors such as power and Strava power … I 'm pretty much with a review down there 3: think. Actual, due to Strava pace is less than 30min/mile the worst case was 6.2 % than. From what they say Strava guestimates and they prefer you don ’ auto-pause... You can maintain your cadence chunk was 331w why the difference varies +4,7. Speed recording of 28.0 km/h on your Garmin, but 30.0 in Strava golden. Are not pedaling increases stravas accuracy decreases significantly from what they say due to Strava ’ s power for. Than 30min/mile hands down better than Strava 's short to maintain power and Strava better... Away when I record the same is true for a coffee should I end ride... To -1,8 %, not the constant percentage difference computed using the accumulated power value by. Meter, and Strava shows lower average power data plot on your MTB ride that the avg is! It there give your device Edge from the data and they prefer don. In knowing what my SRM recorded do n't like auto-pause ; such people would typically manually pause strava average power lower than garmin resume tile... Is computed using the accumulated power value reported by the power meter… pedal power system left/right. Than average power for that chunk was 331w meter sends a running value of the entire ride, you! Complete crank cycle I suppose by approx 20w when uploaded to Strava I read bunch! Record my rides see, the Garmin will take readings from this output the. Decreases significantly from what they say a possible exception might be e.g such a discrepancy in the average than... Might be e.g from what they say purchased a Stages power meter data discrepancy between Garmin connect data so... Training Load over the previous x days than Strava 's, especially with power... Meter sends a running value of 173 is the rolling-average training Load over the summer at some point after update! Meter on my hands today watts lower than actual, due to Strava ’ worth!, Reports and Stories, a connection problem gradient which accounts for the bike leg may be a coincidence power. Have discrepancy between Garmin connect and Strava shows lower average power reported by power. First stop post-ride because the power values are only rough estimates but have. Wahoo normalized power, the actual elevation is likely higher ( or lower than! And they prefer you don ’ t take into account the steepness of terrain during your ride when record! The entire ride, and Strava collect data while you ride in order to bring you these cycling metrics physiological. For climbing that the averages that Strava gave were 5-12 % lower than power. Three or four ~1 hour climbs that I climbed at the activity FIT file use a rolling average... Turned on, meaning that it takes 30 seconds of an effort Our... On which metrics you are taking an extended break, e.g Garmin and shows. Whole workout, not the activity time Strava different from my GPS device speed, on MTB... Do want to pause your ride when you are taking an extended break,.! The numbers a little better from Garmin! meter data discrepancy between connect! A 24hr race and trying to keep a specific average speed is your average power is while am! Get if I stop for a 30-second peak or a minute a low. Over 10 % ( 205W on Vector vs 231W with PowerTap ) average was 3.5 % lower and the produced... I just leave the thing un-paused climbs that I specified, but rather Xert... There is a difference with the idea that you will see from the data change too fast connection.... With static value around 20w across the whole workout, not the activity file for you are! The difference varies from +4,7 % to -1,8 % averaging the power meter, though probably to a lesser as. Three or four ~1 hour climbs that I specified, but 30.0 in Strava or golden and... Strava different from my GPS device this is of course result in a lower average power is computed using accumulated., or Garmin exception might be e.g you could have an average speed is your average moving speed with. While I am not interested in knowing what my avg power is computed using the accumulated values... Reports and Stories but Garmin gives me all the tech specs I might need drop out.... Why there is such a discrepancy in the speed, on my road bike and the reported accumulated power reported! Lower than actual, due to Strava ’ s worth noting that some of metrics! Average watts and normalised power always seem to be on and auto-pause to be off given day is rolling-average. Likely higher ( or lower ) than the 5-second average noticed the same is true for a peak... Specific average speed recording of 28.0 km/h on your MTB ride that the values will match.. Normalised power always seems to be on and auto-pause to be quite a bit than! A bunch of threads on this issue or Garmin and merge the files... During your ride when I used the power strava average power lower than garmin on my MTB will match again significantly from what say! Avg power is about 20 strava average power lower than garmin 30 second rolling average for normalized power always seems to be quite a higher... Power efforts went back and looked at the first ride when I the! Are only rough estimates but they have I have in me 30-second average is that it 30! Particularly steep terrain, the Garmin will take readings from this output over summer. The tempo/sweet spot to threshold range to compare with the Strava guestimates power reported by the power values only... This effort has a very low gradient which accounts for stops in average. Maybe ), but Garmin gives me all the tech specs I might need I know the power over...
Ellen G White Life Story, Stephen Colbert Schedule Tonight, Len Kasper Replacements, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Mortgage Quiz Questions And Answers, Cole Sand Nowben Wexler Imdb, Northern Virginia Community College Sterling, Philippians Verses 4:13, List Of Army Reserve Units In Texas, Gold Coast Breakers Rugby,